On Communication

At first glance, the situation seemed normal.

I was on the floor of an apartment bedroom, with another kid on the other side of the room. Between us lay some toys — miniature dinosaurs, trains, and cars.

It was the kind of scene that was commonplace when children spent time together. But this was no normal encounter.

For one thing, this apartment was in China. The place was comfortable enough, but still rather rudimentary.

And that kid I was hanging out with? He was the nephew of a family friend. Just like me, he was 10 years old. But he spoke no English. And I spoke no Chinese.

We stared at each other in silence for what seemed like an eternity. Both of us were perplexed by the situation we were in.

Then, the boy took one of the dinosaurs from the floor and guided it across the bed. As he did, I made dinosaur noises.

Of course, I didn’t really know what a dinosaur sounded like. The real ones predated me by millions of years.

But it didn’t matter. My sound effects made the boy smile, and then chuckle. Soon enough, we were having a blast, without sharing a single word.


Much has been made about the keys to success.

Some have pointed to talent and opportunity. Others champion focus and grit.

These are important attributes. But I think they all play second fiddle.

Communication is the most skill there is. And yet, it seems to be the most overlooked one.

We have all kinds of acronyms to describe our performance — IQ (Intelligence Quotient) for smarts, EQ (Emotional Quotient) for social acuity, AQ (Adversity Quotient) for resilience. But all too often, we fail to assess our CQ — or communication quotient.

Perhaps we struggle to quantify the benefits. After all, the smartest people can solve the most pressing problems. The most socially affable people can draw a crowd. And the most resilient people turn setbacks into triumphs.

What awaits the best communicators? It’s hard to come up with concrete examples.

And yet, we know the devastating impacts of poor communication all too well. Failed communication can torpedo even the most promising venture. It can damage relationships, corrode trust and vaporize goodwill.

These are major issues. But we like to pretend we’re immune to them.

We’re not.


Not long ago, I went back to school to earn an MBA (Master’s degree in Business Administration).

My business school coursework gave me several new talents — the ability to read financial statements, to understand economic theory, and to enact pricing strategy, for instance. But the most impactful course I took was on business presentations.

At first glance, this seems strange. I already had a college degree in communications, and I’d spent three years working in the news media. Plus, I’d put together several PowerPoints in my marketing career and I’d written plenty of articles here on Words of the West.

But even with all this communication experience, I knew I had room for improvement. There were plenty of times where I had been called to the carpet for a work email that didn’t land the way I intended. And I often struggled to make the desired impact when speaking up at staff meetings.

This course wasn’t designed to address any of that. It was simply a primer on how to present to business executives. And yet, I found it transformative.

For the course didn’t just address the all-too-common fear of public speaking. It delved into the intricacies of eye contact. It established guidelines for speaking cadence. And it provided instructions on how to create a slide deck that tells a story.

These tips were more focused on the audience than the presenter. They were meant to ensure that the message landed properly.

That, of course, is the most important aspect of communication. Messages are only effective if others can decode them in the way we intended. The audience reaction is everything.

I had learned that skill, by necessity, on that day in China. Even with a language barrier in my midst, I’d managed to forge a friendship with a boy my age.

And yet, I had seemed to forget what I’d learned over all the intervening years. But that changed once I took the business presentations class.

I left the course on a mission to be a more effective communicator. I wanted to ensure that my messages landed with precision moving forward, no matter the medium.

This mission is still ongoing. But I’m encouraged by the progress I’ve made thus far.

Still, I wish this wasn’t a solitary quest.


For millennia, humans have evolved their communication techniques.

We started by making standardized noises, which evolved into language. Oral storytelling, cave paintings, and hieroglyphics came next, followed by the written word.

The advent of the printing press and — much later — the microphone spawned mass communication. Radio and television spread these messages ever wider. And ultimately, the Internet made communication both global and simultaneous.

Communication has never been more convenient. Today, we literally have the tools for it at our fingertips. And yet, we fail to use those tools properly.

This is particularly noticeable at our current moment of strife.

A health crisis has cost the world millions of lives. And an economic crisis has cost America millions of jobs. But it’s an ongoing communication crisis that is perhaps most profound.

A world connected as never before has, paradoxically, never seemed further apart. And as the dialogue breaks down, polarization only deepens.

I understand the temptation to eschew open lines of communication. Engaging with others can be tough work, particularly when we have little in common. And the risk of a blunder seems to outweigh the rewards of avoiding communication altogether.

But this laissez-faire attitude has its costs. We’re seeing these broadly now, through the radicalization of society. But we’re seeing them individually as well.

No, not all of us will end up in a room with someone who doesn’t speak our language. But many of us will find ourselves outside our depth at some point. Perhaps we already have.

Basic communication skills can aid us in these unsettling circumstances. But if we’ve let those skills atrophy, there’s no guarantee they’ll come back to us in time. We could quickly find ourselves up a creek without a paddle.

Fortunately, the power still lies in our hands. But it’s our obligation to do something about it.

So, let’s give communication the priority it deserves. Let’s make a choice to engage, even when it seems inconvenient. And let’s ensure our messages stick the landing.

The challenges we face are substantial. But if we communicate with precision, we stand a better chance of rising to the occasion.

Let’s get to it.

The Systems Thinking Advantage

How do you look at the world?

It depends on your perspective.

Some might focus on the unpredictability therein. On the surprise occurrences — good and bad — that can either make our day or ruin it.

The temptation here is all too often to find a pattern in the random noise. To turn to a higher power — be it faith or superstition — to explain it. Or else, to turn to pessimism and declare that managing life’s volatility is a fool’s errand.

Others might focus on the constants. On the rising and setting of the sun. Or the feeling of fresh air in our lungs.

This view is fixed at the macro level. It’s far too tempting to ignore the ups and downs altogether — even if some of them can be quite significant. And it’s far too easy to check out from everyday life.

In reality, both of these ways of looking at the world — divergent as they may seem — share a common issue.

Both seek to place responsibility on a single entity for the adventures we encounter.

Whether we’re screaming at the driver who ran the red light and almost T-boned our car, or we’re thanking God for the beautiful weather, we’re placing all blame or praise in one place.

It’s just us and them. Nothing in between.

We act as if we have a ledger, and we’re making sure everyone knows the score.

But there’s no way that everyone knows the score. Because each person has their own scorebook.

The experiences we face are unique. Each of us faces our own reality each and every day.

And when our realities collide with those of others — literally or metaphorically — standing around and pointing fingers does no one any good. On the contrary, this only serves to sow divisiveness and mistrust — the dual viruses that happen to be plaguing our society more than ever these days.

So, when we find ourselves in this position, what should we do?

We should take a step back. And we should look at the underlying architecture.


 

Awhile back, I took a professional assessment. A questionnaire that looks at how someone thinks, and how that thought process jibes with their personality archetype.

Many of the results of the assessment didn’t surprise me all that much. But one floored me.

There, on the summary page were four words: Thinks like an engineer.

I looked at those words and laughed.

I fancied myself the furthest thing from an engineer. I despised math growing up, and I gave up on science before I could even get to physics.

I seemed to be missing all the ingredients needed to be a halfway-competent engineer, let alone a savant.

Yet, the more I thought about it, the more I realized this proclamation wasn’t about the craft of engineering at all.

It was about adherence to systems.

Engineers adopt systems thinking. They distill a volatile environment into a more manageable series of systems. Then, they design solutions that meet the specifications and constraints of each system.

This is the secret to engineering success. And engineering success has transformed our world.

While there have been some notable engineering gaffes over the years, they’re dwarfed by the number of successful projects and designs. One need only drive on an interstate highway, cross a bridge over the Mississippi or ascend a Chicago high-rise to see the brilliance of engineering.

Systems thinking has worked its magic, time and again.

Yet, systems thinking is not only an engineering phenomenon. It can also be used to deal with political drama and understand the makeup of entire industries.

The more we consider the landscape of the environment we’re probing, and the more methodically we can chart our moves, the more successful we’ll be. That’s how the systems thinking theory goes.

I believe in this theory, and have practiced it for years. I just didn’t realize it until I took that assessment.


What does systems thinking look like in day-to-day life?

It can vary, depending on the situation.

But in general, it requires taking a look at the underlying structure of whatever we’re facing, and seeing how this structure could have caused the scenarios you encountered.

As an example, let’s take a look at the workplace. If you’re like millions of other gainfully employed citizens, you might spend a few of your hard-earned wages at Happy Hour with your colleagues or friends.

And what do you do at Happy Hour? You complain about work!

You make a big fuss about how you’re overworked, underappreciated and underpaid. About how much your 9 to 5 life stinks, and how much those in charge are leading to your misery.

I know this pattern, because I once lived it.

When we feel underappreciated at work, it’s easy to blame our boss — either tacitly or at impromptu Happy Hours. It’s basically an American pastime at this point.

Yet, our boss likely has a boss. As such, they might be dealing with similar issues and frustration from up in the ranks.

In fact, even if your boss is the owner or the CEO, they still have people or standards to answer to. These might be customers, investors or the company legacy itself.

Yes, a business is a massive system. A system with many moving parts that must remain synchronized to see sustained success.

Understanding the dynamics of this system can help you assess the situation you face and rationalize actions or decisions.

Perhaps your boss is not actively working to snub you. Perhaps they’re dealing with a full plate themselves. Or perhaps they trust you enough not to micromanage you.

And perhaps, with everything functioning the way it should, the issue you face is not as significant as you’re making it. If you’re contributing to the mission, being compensated fairly for your efforts and not at risk of being shown the door, you’re in a good spot. Visceral approval from your boss is more icing on the cake than a fundamental need.

Better not to make a mountain of a molehill.

Did you notice what happened there? By applying systems thinking, we diffused the situation. Instead of our grievance being a budding confrontation between ourselves and our supervisors — an Us vs. Them scenario — it became a systems problem. And then, suddenly, it wasn’t much of a problem at all.

This type of collectivist thinking can help in many other situations too. When we understand the system, it’s much easier to recognize that we’re all in this together. We’re less likely to have an urge to spar — unless we’re confronted by someone who’s truly acting selfish or malicious.

So, let’s change our perspective. Let’s stop looking to pin blame or praise in one place. Let’s take the time to look at the underlying architecture instead.

Systems thinking works. Let’s see how it can work for us.