The Library of Alexandria.
It was one of the first great wonders of the world.
An impressive structure overlooking the Mediterranean Sea, the library housed a great deal of the world’s written knowledge – all accumulated in the shadow of Alexander the Great’s empire.
For roughly two centuries, hundreds of thousands of works sat within its walls. But then, the Romans besieged Alexandria. And during the mayhem, the library burned to the ground.
All those works were lost forever.
The burning of the Library of Alexandra occurred more than 2000 years ago. And yet, the event still stirs up vivid responses.
Many mourn the loss of knowledge. Others lament the brutality of humankind. Still others daydream about loading up Doc Brown’s DeLorean from Back to the Future, just to ferry all those papyrus scrolls to safety.
And then there’s me. I wonder if the loss of those ancient texts wasn’t the worst thing in the world.
Now, to be clear, I would not classify myself as closed-minded. Quite the opposite.
I know that the burning of the Library of Alexandria was, at best, an unfortunate event. And I understand the implications as well as anyone.
You see, I’ve always been passionate about accumulating information. When I was a toddler, I memorized the various models of cars on the road, reciting my knowledge for all who would listen. When I was a teenager in the pre-Google Maps era, people would call me to ask for directions. And now, as an adult, friends love to tap into my knowledge of sports statistics.
My brain is its own library. And with the Internet era in full force, I can add a new wing to the collection with just a few clicks.
And yet, there are some downsides to this scenario. With so much new information to absorb, and such an eagerness to learn, it’s all too easy for me to get overwhelmed. It’s possible for me to attempt to take in everything — and end up gaining nothing in the process.
This has happened to me before. I’ve gone down research rabbit holes until my brain hurt and I couldn’t see straight. I’ve forgotten to eat, to go to bed, or to get outside and live a bit.
And the inverse has afflicted me as well. I’ve filled bookshelves and digital queues with unviewed materials. All as I’ve waited for there to be enough free time in my life to consume them.
Time provides the limits to my openness. There is only so much of it to go around. And it’s continually getting depleted.
These constraints force me to take in knowledge at a measured pace. And any time I seek to game the system, I find myself paying the price.
Time is undefeated.
This paradox also afflicted the scholars of Alexandria. They too were human. Meaning they too were constrained in terms of information capture.
They didn’t have the capacity to store all the library’s works in their brains. If they had, they could have rebuild the library from the ashes, drafting new papyrus scrolls from memory.
And that, of course, did not happen.
So yes, it’s easy to long for life without the fire. It’s easy to imagine all that information from the Library of Alexandria stored digitally, in the modern day, on some remote server somewhere.
But how much of it would truly be absorbed by the masses? That answer is sure to underwhelm.
I’m writing this article in the heyday of Artificial Intelligence.
In just a few short years, AI buzz has shifted from Predictive Analytics to Machine Learning to Assistants to Agents.
The world’s information has never been easier to access. And for the first time, a significant share of it has been generated by the machines themselves.
(But not this article. Ember Trace is an AI-free column.)
Many have marveled about the possibilities the AI era unlocks. The ability to democratize knowledge and boost productivity — all with reduced effort — seems like something out of a science fiction novel from yesteryear.
And yet, underneath all that hype lies a sobering reality.
You see, for all their power and prowess, machines are built to serve us. Their origin stories are intertwined with our needs. And their outputs are effectively restricted by the boundaries of our comprehension.
There’s only so much that we can take in before the hourglass runs out of sand. And that means there are only so many ways we can make use of our virtual knowledge warriors.
Despite our best efforts to manifest infinite possibilities, we are no less constrained than before.
The limits of openness. They strike again.
Intellectual curiosity.
It’s a mouthful. But one that carries plenty of promise.
Those eager to soak up knowledge, those willing to question the status quo — they’ve changed the world. These renegades have built nations, harnessed new technologies, and inspired many.
Including me.
And the heart of my information capture inclinations lies a passion for intellectual curiosity. I yearn to keep my mind as fit as my body.
Year after year, I’ve remained steadfast in this pursuit. And year after year, I’ve cursed the boundaries of time that got in the way.
But lately, I’ve started to change my tune.
For I now recognize that those boundaries are more like guardrails than straitjackets. They’re meant to protect, rather than restrict.
These limits of openness force me to choose which knowledge to absorb. And they demand that I prioritize information that can be turned to action.
This tradeoff has made me functionally wise. It’s forced me to consider the implications of all I’ve learned. And those implications have benefited those around me.
This is the silver lining the fire of Alexandria. As the great library turned to soot, so did the notion that knowledge could be hoarded and stored in a single location.
Those learnings would need to be socialized instead. They’d need to be dispersed among the populace and put to practical use.
I’m honored to carry on that tradition. And yet, I hope I’m not the only disciple.
An eagerness to learn is a gift. But the limits of openness are a blessing.
Heed both.
